UK· 6 min read

Diageo Cameronbridge Strike|Eight Jobs in a $1bn Cost Drive?

Eight jobs, a widening walkout

Unite is widening its strike at Diageo's Cameronbridge distillery in Scotland, over job cuts Diageo says touch only eight people. The union expects production to stop, yet Diageo says it expects no disruption to its products. More than one hundred Unite members are involved. That is more than twelve strikers for each person whose job is at stake.

And those eight jobs sit inside a cost-saving drive of about one billion dollars, led by chief executive Sir Dave Lewis. Diageo's own figures make the dispute look small. The proposal removes ten roles among the seventy-two staff in grain distilling. Two of those posts are already empty. So eight people are affected. The site employs about two hundred workers.

On those figures, the people affected are roughly four in every hundred at Cameronbridge. Diageo employs about three thousand people across Scotland. Yet the action keeps growing. It began on the twenty-eighth of September, with specific groups such as process controllers, technicians, chemists and engineers. Now Unite says all its members will strike on four days in October. The first is the twelfth.

The last is the twenty-second. Talks between the two sides have failed. Unite said the "escalation" responds "to Diageo management reaffirming its threat to push through compulsory redundancies". The word that matters is compulsory. For the union, this is not only about eight people. Unite's general secretary, Sharon Graham, said there was "no justification for slashing hundreds of jobs across its operations".

She added that Diageo "is raking in hundreds of millions of profit." Another union, GMB, said in August that Diageo had put hundreds of jobs at risk across its Highlands and Islands distilleries. It warned that thirty-eight could lose their jobs. Diageo draws the line more narrowly. It says this dispute is limited to Cameronbridge.

Who feels the strike

So the two sides disagree about the scale of the fight. They also disagree about its effect. Unite expects the strike to bring production to a standstill, and so increase pressure on Diageo. A Diageo spokesperson said: "We are disappointed with the decision to strike. We do not expect any disruption to the availability of our products resulting from this action."

Sharon Graham answered in very different terms: "Diageo's behaviour toward its loyal and skilled workforce at Cameronbridge is disgraceful." The spokesperson called the cuts "a difficult but necessary step". The reason given was that Diageo will "maintain reduced production volumes". The company says it remains open to dialogue. Diageo's case for the cuts, and its calm about supply, rest on the same fact.

The distillery is already making less. It is not alone. Rob Carpenter, who runs the Edinburgh distiller Holyrood, said the Scotch industry faces "challenging times", with "many distilleries reducing or pausing production". Holyrood has paused its own whisky production. Nor does Diageo expect a quick rebound. Its revenue fell three per cent in its last financial year, to nineteen point six billion dollars.

For this year, it expects broadly flat organic sales. Diageo's chief executive, Sir Dave Lewis, took over in January. He earned the nickname Drastic Dave for cost-cutting at Unilever, before he turned Tesco around. At Diageo he is seeking about one billion dollars in savings. The company's annual report showed about two thousand fewer staff than a year earlier.

Against that, eight people at Cameronbridge are a fraction of one per cent. Yet one trade commentary tied the two together. It said Lewis faces the strike "as he tries to cut jobs to match declining demand." The savings are not meant to sit still. The Telegraph reported that money saved from job cuts will fund an overhaul of brands such as Captain Morgan and Smirnoff, where sales have declined.

Diageo also plans to double production of Guinness. Its sales rose twelve per cent in the twelve months to June. In late September, Lewis named Joanne Wilson, the finance chief of WPP, as Diageo's next chief financial officer. She will be its third in less than three years. Lewis said she "will ensure we accelerate the turnaround of Diageo". Analysts at Jefferies pointed to her strong record on cost efficiency.

So the cuts at Cameronbridge belong to a plan that Diageo is now hiring to speed up.

Cutting where it grows

If the savings are meant to feed Guinness, the next decision looks odd. Diageo said it will close the Guinness Open Gate Brewery near Baltimore on the first of November, after eight years. It opened in twenty eighteen as the first Guinness brewery in the United States in sixty years. It employed about one hundred people, across a restaurant, a taproom and a small innovation brewery.

That is around twelve times the number of people affected at Cameronbridge. And it carries the one brand Diageo plans to make twice as much of. The details show this was not a sudden retreat. Diageo shut the site's main beer production in June twenty twenty-three. It moved its Baltimore Blonde beer to New York. A source familiar with the decision said the brewery had become increasingly difficult to sustain.

The source cited rising operating costs, shifts in consumer demand and broader economic pressures. Other operating models were judged not viable. Diageo's spokesman said: "Guinness remains one of our most important brands." The company is "committed to investing in its long-term growth and success." After the closure, the only Guinness brewery left in the United States will be in Chicago.

So the Baltimore decision separates the brand from the building. A growing brand did not protect a site whose costs no longer fit. Diageo gives Cameronbridge the same logic. Lower volumes. Fewer roles. The money freed by such cuts is meant for brands. In the same week, a court ruled on two of them. A federal judge in Brooklyn, LaShann DeArcy Hall, dismissed a proposed class action against Diageo.

It alleged that Casamigos and Don Julio tequilas were falsely labelled "100% agave". The plaintiffs said independent laboratory testing found none "came close to being made entirely from 100% agave." The judge said the buyers and restaurants had failed to show how they were harmed. She also said a study of "five samples" could not support an inference of "ubiquitous, systemic mislabeling."

Diageo said it was "gratified that the court rejected plaintiffs' adulteration allegations in their entirety". The plaintiffs' lawyer, Steve Berman, said the ruling "gets the record wrong". They may ask the court to reconsider. The stakes sit in America. Jefferies says the United States makes up about forty per cent of Diageo's sales.

It calls winning back tequila, where Don Julio and Casamigos have stumbled, one of the biggest battlegrounds. So the week has two halves. Costs come out in Scotland and Baltimore. Money is meant to flow back into brands. The court win removes one threat to brands at the centre of the American recovery, for now. Reuters also reported that two similar lawsuits were filed in California and Florida.

The reports on this ruling do not say where those cases stand.

What decides the strike

Back to the opening split. Unite expects production to stop. Diageo expects no disruption. Eight jobs carry this weight because they are where a plan to make less, and spend on brands, meets an organised walkout. The first test is the all-member strike days, starting on the twelfth of October. Diageo then reports first-quarter trading on the fifth of November, alongside its annual meeting.

Shareholders can send questions in advance. If those days pass without supply problems and the compulsory redundancies go ahead, Diageo shows its cost plan can proceed against resistance. Shareholders gain evidence for the savings case. Eight workers lose their jobs. If production does stop, or Diageo steps back from compulsory redundancies, the union gains ground in a wider fight.

The unions say hundreds of other Scottish jobs are at risk, and the savings case would face a harder road.

Sources

Informational only, not investment advice. Figures and quotes come from the linked reports.